Saturday, May 17, 2014
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
URGENT: Dr. Michael Salla/Andy Basiago secret meeting.
Amazing..! Not only Dr. Michael Salla recognizes our bases in Mars, but apparently the exopolitician meet with Andy Basiago, the time-jumper. Reliable sources told us that Basiago will be in charge of the Chronopolitical journal. This closed doors meeting between the whistleblower and the professor of Galactic Diplomacy was protected by bodyguards and a sophisticated ultrasound alarm that include anti-satellite detection. This is information in developing so remain aware. Thanks. 
Friday, March 7, 2014
Monday, March 3, 2014
Do not PAY for what is FREE.
In one of Richard Dolan’s websites, we read:
“Richard Dolan is among the world’s leading researchers and historians of the UFO subject.” http://richarddolanpress.com/
Call it arrogance if you will, but truth is that Richard is a show-man, and this is nothing but show, and those who make a living selling UFO fictions as facts, know that the show must go on, even if in Ufology there is never nothing new. When self proclaimed “world leading researchers” understand this, what remains is to write the same book again and again.
There researchers are already immersed in the well known mass of contradictions, childish nonsense, insanity, faked sources and perhaps consciousness. In that moment, cognitive dissonance is inevitable.
However to keep the show going on and the books in the market, some of them, like Richard Dolan, will frequently contradict themselves. Talking about disclosure, they will say that UFO are non-human solid objects presumably of extraterrestrial origin.
The same “leading UFO researcher” in a different occasion will recognize that the UFO phenomenon is infinitely more complex that all we could imagine.
The law here is that “UFO are what you want them to be, or not-be.”
Anyway, Let me give you an advice. BEFORE BUYING NEW UFO BOOKS, take a look at this site: The Saga of the Flying Objects.
You will learn a few things; the most important is this one: WHAT SHOULD YOU PAY FOR WHAT IS FREE IN THE INTERNET? The Saga of the Flying Objects.
Monday, February 3, 2014
Aliens alleged to interfere in human love relationships
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/headline_news/2014/02/03/7701.html
Ah dear friends. There are events and entities that should remain unknown, hidden under the veil of ignorance.Perhaps knowledge will not make us free; perhaps we are not prepared for our inevitable confrontation with truth, particularly if truth is a synonymous of horror.
alintel36gmail.com
Friday, January 31, 2014
Mutant Memes in Ufology and the ET religion.
As we wrote previously, the UFO subculture leaders fight against an apparently invincible enemy: the Nothing Happens Syndrome.
Usually the professional ufologists and self-promoters are forced to confront this total lack of events if they want to keep the believers interested in the UFO-are-extraterrestrial hypothesis.
The self proclaimed Exopoliticians, contactees, Councilors of Earth, time-travelers and Experts in Universal Legislation have indeed some basic rhetorical instruments to perform this trick.
Let me give you some samples:
The Cover-Up myth is one of these instruments for the preservation of the ET mythology.
IF there is a massive conspiracy for keeping the ET-UFO secret, the UFO mythologist can say and write absolutely what he/she wants. If evidences are demanded, he will evade the demand making the Cover Up responsible for the lack of evidences.
Obviously, is someone asks for evidences about the Cover Up itself, they will either call you a debunker in a blatant ad hominem fallacy, or they will close the discussion adducing that because of the cover up, there are no evidences of the cover-up.
However, this giant cover up will give the UFO=ET mythologist new possibilities of deception. They will create imaginary whistle-blowers keeping the true believers convinced that the cover up is a fact.
However, the Contactees and UFO pundits must give the impression that they know the truth about the extraterrestrial presence in our planet.
For this, they will produce massive rhetorical nonsense presented as truth, and utilize the advice of the Infamous Nazi Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels: “If you repeat a lie one hundred times, that lie will become true...”
The presumed meeting of President Eisenhower with Extraterrestrials is a good example of this:
Dr. Michael Salla claims that President Eisenhower "met with two ETs with white hair, pale blue eyes and colorless lips," referred by alien enthusiasts as "Nordics."
He told the Washington Post that "The "Nordics" offered to share their superior technology and their spiritual wisdom with Ike if he would agree to eliminate America's nuclear weapons." Salla says the President declined the offer. He also told to his interviewer that President Eisenhower had agreed with another race of aliens that they could take livestock and humans with them for the purposes of experiments. He estimated that those aliens had taken "millions" of humans.
Michael Salla admitted to the Washington Post that the evidence supporting his claims about the existence of aliens was found by him "on the internet."
The absolute absence of evidences was not an obstacle for the Eisenhower-Aliens Meme. If you read posts or messages from some UFO fans, you will find that they talk about this pseudo-event with a total acceptance. The lie repeated one hundred times becomes true.
But I want to talk about those mutant memes, because this phenomenon shows the power of the Nothing Happens Syndrome.
First the obvious: the aliens are invisible. 94 % of the Unidentified Flying Objects are in fact identified as natural phenomena or man-made artifacts. The other 6% in any way is confirmation of intelligent extraterrestrial crafts. That 6 % remains unidentified.
However the Exo-mythologists imposed the irrational identification UFO = Extraterrestrial Crafts.
Not even this falsification is enough. The good aliens coming here to help us, becomes soon unbelievable. We must be complete ignorant to believe that this advanced visitors come just to whisper in the ear of contactees the well known blend of New Age rhetoric and Sunday Morning Religion.
Here we have the rationale of the mutation. It becomes necessary to create bad aliens and powerful ones, and our Exopoliticians created the imaginary military-alien-industrial complex.
Thanks to this inexistent organization, Exopoliticians and other Irrational fantasists will be able to write non-sense, describe secret wars between good and bad aliens, and justify the absence of evidence and keep the UFO subculture alive.
However this mutant memes produce contradictory statements that show clearly that Exofantasists contradict themselves each one have his own mythology. This is obviously the evidence that all of them are talking about imaginary entities that have nothing to do with the real world.
But…are we talking about adults here? Yes, these fantasists selling the most ridiculous fiction as fact are adults.
Motivations? We can suggest some: The Ego Trip in border-line personalities that crave for some “popularity” is a motivation. Commercialism is the second one, with individuals trying to make a living selling these fictions. Personally, I do not believe in any deliberate manipulation of disinformation.
Of course, in some cases we must consider Insanity.
What will be the future of Irrational Ufology?. I think that Ufology will become religion.
Why? Because religion works through faith, not reason.
The inexistent ET will become also inexistent gods or angels. UFO fantasists will become the preachers of the new Religion.
Doubts and questions, of course, will become sins.
More important, the real thing, the coming will be a promise, as the Second Coming of Christ.
UFO fans will pray and wait just wait. Someone will write a new Sacred Book; the ET Bible.
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Thursday, January 9, 2014
Fwd: [New post] 2013 in review
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tomas Scolarici <tscolarici@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: [New post] 2013 in review
To: alintel36@gmail.com
--
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem,
"Occam's Razor"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/
From: Tomas Scolarici <tscolarici@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: [New post] 2013 in review
To: alintel36@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tomas Scolarici <tscolarici@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM
Subject: Fwd: [New post] 2013 in review
To: Alfred Lambremont Webre <exopolitics@exopolitics.com>
--
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem,
"Occam's Razor"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/
From: Tomas Scolarici <tscolarici@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM
Subject: Fwd: [New post] 2013 in review
To: Alfred Lambremont Webre <exopolitics@exopolitics.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert Graham's Anarchism Weblog <comment-reply@wordpress.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:02 AM
Subject: [New post] 2013 in review
To: tscolarici@gmail.com
From: Robert Graham's Anarchism Weblog <comment-reply@wordpress.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:02 AM
Subject: [New post] 2013 in review
To: tscolarici@gmail.com
|
WordPress.comentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem,
"Occam's Razor"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem,
"Occam's Razor"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
Tomas Scolarici is still waiting for you to join Twitter...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Tomas Scolarici sent you an invitation
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 DISINFORMATION RULES.
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, and speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-25-rules-of-disinformation/
Monday, October 28, 2013
Breaking news! Christie Carter
Hello! http://gimc-consulting.com/ciwcyfd/nchvf Best regards! Christie Carter
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Fwd: UFOs gunned down as Drones.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <for.your.eyes.only@nyms.net>
Date: Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Subject: UFOs gunned down as Drones.
To: ALINTEL36@gmail.com
Drones are now the worst indirect enemies of UFOs (Alien Invasion Aircraft.)
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS), also known as drones, are either controlled by 'pilots' from the ground or increasingly, autonomously following a pre-programmed mission.
Now, when UFO, (ET vehicles ) are gunned down, this destruction is disguised as a drone shot incident. D.S.I.
After all, even if drones come from friendly countries, their destruction is seen as a justified mistake.
In fact this advance makes things a lot easier for those who protect our Earth.
Information is Power.
F.Y.E.O.
From: <for.your.eyes.only@nyms.net>
Date: Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Subject: UFOs gunned down as Drones.
To: ALINTEL36@gmail.com
Drones are now the worst indirect enemies of UFOs (Alien Invasion Aircraft.)
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS), also known as drones, are either controlled by 'pilots' from the ground or increasingly, autonomously following a pre-programmed mission.
Now, when UFO, (ET vehicles ) are gunned down, this destruction is disguised as a drone shot incident. D.S.I.
After all, even if drones come from friendly countries, their destruction is seen as a justified mistake.
In fact this advance makes things a lot easier for those who protect our Earth.
Information is Power.
F.Y.E.O.
Fwd: UFOs gunned down as Drones.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <for.your.eyes.only@nyms.net>
Date: Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Subject: UFOs gunned down as Drones.
To: ALINTEL36@gmail.com
Drones are now the worst indirect enemies of UFOs (Alien Invasion Aircraft.)
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS), also known as drones, are either controlled by 'pilots' from the ground or increasingly, autonomously following a pre-programmed mission.
Now, when UFO, (ET vehicles ) are gunned down, this destruction is disguised as a drone shot incident. D.S.I.
After all, even if drones come from friendly countries, their destruction is seen as a justified mistake.
In fact this advance makes things a lot easier for those who protect our Earth.
Information is Power.
F.Y.E.O.
From: <for.your.eyes.only@nyms.net>
Date: Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Subject: UFOs gunned down as Drones.
To: ALINTEL36@gmail.com
Drones are now the worst indirect enemies of UFOs (Alien Invasion Aircraft.)
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS), also known as drones, are either controlled by 'pilots' from the ground or increasingly, autonomously following a pre-programmed mission.
Now, when UFO, (ET vehicles ) are gunned down, this destruction is disguised as a drone shot incident. D.S.I.
After all, even if drones come from friendly countries, their destruction is seen as a justified mistake.
In fact this advance makes things a lot easier for those who protect our Earth.
Information is Power.
F.Y.E.O.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Fwd: Be careful with Richard Boylan...!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Leste Valis <impostors.hoaxers.alert@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:01 AM
Subject: Be careful with Richard Boylan...!
To: alintel36@gmail.com
From: Leste Valis <impostors.hoaxers.alert@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:01 AM
Subject: Be careful with Richard Boylan...!
To: alintel36@gmail.com
Dr. Richard Boylan lost his licenses for ABUSES against his female patients.
We include the pertinent document as EVIDENCE.
Also YAHOO deleted two of the Boylan's groups for abusive content and inapropriate messages sent to children.
Monday, April 8, 2013
NETUREI KARTA
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <anti-zionist_orthodox_jews@nyms.net>
Date: Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:34 PM
Subject: Neturei Karta
http://www.nkusa.org/index.cfm
Neturei Karta opposed the establishment of and retain all opposition to the existence of the so-called "State of Israel"!
Neturei-Karta is the Aramaic term for "Guardians of the City. The name Neturei-Karta originates from an incident in which R. Yehudah Ha-Nassi (Rabbi Judah the Prince) sent R. Hiyya and R. Ashi on a pastoral tour of inspection. In one town they asked to see the "guardians of the city" and the city guard was paraded before them. They said that these were not the guardians of the city but its destroyers, which prompted the citizens to ask who, then, could be considered the guardians. The rabbis answered, "The scribes and the scholars," referring them to Tehillim (Psalms) Chap. 127. (Jerusalem Talmud, Tractate Hagiga. 76c).
The name was given to a group of Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem who refused (and still refuse) to recognize the existence or authority of the so-called "State of Israel" and made (and still make) a point of publicly demonstrating their position, the position of the Torah and authentic unadulterated Judaism. 
From: <anti-zionist_orthodox_jews@nyms.net>
Date: Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:34 PM
Subject: Neturei Karta
http://www.nkusa.org/index.cfm
Neturei Karta opposed the establishment of and retain all opposition to the existence of the so-called "State of Israel"!
Neturei-Karta is the Aramaic term for "Guardians of the City. The name Neturei-Karta originates from an incident in which R. Yehudah Ha-Nassi (Rabbi Judah the Prince) sent R. Hiyya and R. Ashi on a pastoral tour of inspection. In one town they asked to see the "guardians of the city" and the city guard was paraded before them. They said that these were not the guardians of the city but its destroyers, which prompted the citizens to ask who, then, could be considered the guardians. The rabbis answered, "The scribes and the scholars," referring them to Tehillim (Psalms) Chap. 127. (Jerusalem Talmud, Tractate Hagiga. 76c).
The name was given to a group of Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem who refused (and still refuse) to recognize the existence or authority of the so-called "State of Israel" and made (and still make) a point of publicly demonstrating their position, the position of the Torah and authentic unadulterated Judaism.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Fwd: ARCHONS: NEW MESSAGE.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <archons@nyms.net>
Date: Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 4:47 PM
Subject: ARCHONS: NEW MESSAGE.
To: ALINTEL36@gmail.com
We are the protectors of intelligent life and not fallen entities from the alternative dark worlds.
It is however true that we control the Gate that gives access to this Universe, and sometimes we, Archons, authorize the Redeemed few to come into this Universe.
Nor is true that we feed on negative energies.
Humans should consider that there is only one kind of possible friendly contact between us and them. This contact is based on negotiations, since we have much to give and few needs.
It is true: our voices sometimes can be listen by your minds, but our messages are practical and never self-destructive.
Think about this.
Athoth.
Eloaios.
Astaphaios.
Yao.
Sabaoth.
Adonin.
Sabbataios.
Wo ulo dho kladoddalk ad avdorrakovd rado uvk vad durrov ovdadaok dlan dho urdolvudaxo kulk valrkk. <br />Id ak havoxol dlio dhud vo davdlar dho Gudo dhud kaxok uddokk da dhak Uvaxolko, uvk kanodanok vo, Aldhavk, uidhalano dho Rokoonok dov da dano avda dhak Uvaxolko. <br />Nal ak dlio dhud vo dook av vokudaxo ovolkaok. <br />Hinuvk khairk davkakol dhud dholo ak avrav avo kavk ad kakkakro dlaovkrav davdudd kodvoov ik uvk dhon. Thak davdudd ak kukok av vokadaudaavk, kavdo vo huxo nidh da kaxo uvk dov vookk. <br />Id ak dlio: ail xaadok kanodanok duv ko rakdov kav avail navkk, kid ail nokkukok ulo kluddadur uvk voxol kord-kokdliddaxo. <br />Thavk ukaid dhak. <br />Adhadh. <br />Erauaak. <br />Akdukhuaak. <br />Yua. <br />Sukuadh. <br />Akavav. <br />Sukkuduaak. <br />
From: <archons@nyms.net>
Date: Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 4:47 PM
Subject: ARCHONS: NEW MESSAGE.
To: ALINTEL36@gmail.com
We are the protectors of intelligent life and not fallen entities from the alternative dark worlds.
It is however true that we control the Gate that gives access to this Universe, and sometimes we, Archons, authorize the Redeemed few to come into this Universe.
Nor is true that we feed on negative energies.
Humans should consider that there is only one kind of possible friendly contact between us and them. This contact is based on negotiations, since we have much to give and few needs.
It is true: our voices sometimes can be listen by your minds, but our messages are practical and never self-destructive.
Think about this.
Athoth.
Eloaios.
Astaphaios.
Yao.
Sabaoth.
Adonin.
Sabbataios.
Wo ulo dho kladoddalk ad avdorrakovd rado uvk vad durrov ovdadaok dlan dho urdolvudaxo kulk valrkk. <br />Id ak havoxol dlio dhud vo davdlar dho Gudo dhud kaxok uddokk da dhak Uvaxolko, uvk kanodanok vo, Aldhavk, uidhalano dho Rokoonok dov da dano avda dhak Uvaxolko. <br />Nal ak dlio dhud vo dook av vokudaxo ovolkaok. <br />Hinuvk khairk davkakol dhud dholo ak avrav avo kavk ad kakkakro dlaovkrav davdudd kodvoov ik uvk dhon. Thak davdudd ak kukok av vokadaudaavk, kavdo vo huxo nidh da kaxo uvk dov vookk. <br />Id ak dlio: ail xaadok kanodanok duv ko rakdov kav avail navkk, kid ail nokkukok ulo kluddadur uvk voxol kord-kokdliddaxo. <br />Thavk ukaid dhak. <br />Adhadh. <br />Erauaak. <br />Akdukhuaak. <br />Yua. <br />Sukuadh. <br />Akavav. <br />Sukkuduaak. <br />
Friday, March 15, 2013
Let's try some "Butterfly Effect" ..!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <in.chaos.we.trust@nyms.net>
Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:07 PM
Subject: Try some "Butterfly Effect" ..!
To: ALINTEL36@gmail.com
In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where a small change at one place in a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences to a later state. The name of the effect, coined by Edward Lorenz, is derived from the theoretical example of a hurricane's formation being contingent on whether or not a distant butterfly had flapped its wings several weeks before.
Although the butterfly effect may appear to be an esoteric and unlikely behavior, it is exhibited by very simple systems: for example, a ball placed at the crest of a hill may roll into any of several valleys depending on, among other things, slight differences in initial position.
The butterfly effect is a common trope in fiction when presenting scenarios involving time travel and with hypotheses where one storyline diverges at the moment of a seemingly minor event resulting in two significantly different outcomes.
Snowball effect is a figurative term for a process that starts from an initial state of small significance and builds upon itself, becoming larger (graver, more serious), and also perhaps potentially dangerous or disastrous (a vicious circle, a "spiral of decline"), though it might be beneficial instead (a virtuous circle). This is a very common cliché in cartoons and modern theatrics and it is also used in Psychology.
The common analogy is with the rolling of a small ball of snow down a snow-covered hillside. As it rolls the ball will pick up more snow, gaining more mass and surface area, and picking up even more snow and momentum as it rolls along.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_effect
From: <in.chaos.we.trust@nyms.net>
Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:07 PM
Subject: Try some "Butterfly Effect" ..!
To: ALINTEL36@gmail.com
In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where a small change at one place in a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences to a later state. The name of the effect, coined by Edward Lorenz, is derived from the theoretical example of a hurricane's formation being contingent on whether or not a distant butterfly had flapped its wings several weeks before.
Although the butterfly effect may appear to be an esoteric and unlikely behavior, it is exhibited by very simple systems: for example, a ball placed at the crest of a hill may roll into any of several valleys depending on, among other things, slight differences in initial position.
The butterfly effect is a common trope in fiction when presenting scenarios involving time travel and with hypotheses where one storyline diverges at the moment of a seemingly minor event resulting in two significantly different outcomes.
Snowball effect is a figurative term for a process that starts from an initial state of small significance and builds upon itself, becoming larger (graver, more serious), and also perhaps potentially dangerous or disastrous (a vicious circle, a "spiral of decline"), though it might be beneficial instead (a virtuous circle). This is a very common cliché in cartoons and modern theatrics and it is also used in Psychology.
The common analogy is with the rolling of a small ball of snow down a snow-covered hillside. As it rolls the ball will pick up more snow, gaining more mass and surface area, and picking up even more snow and momentum as it rolls along.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_effect
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)